Establishing orthometric heights using GNSS — Part 8
August 3, 2016
Upcoming Survey Scene newsletters will carry additional columns in this series. Basic procedures and tools for determining valid published […]
Read More
Upcoming Survey Scene newsletters will carry additional columns in this series. Basic procedures and tools for determining valid published […]
Basic procedures and tools for determining valid NAVD 88 heights for constraints To date, the six parts of “Establishing Orthometric […]
Basic procedures and tools for ensuring GNSS-derived orthometric heights meet the project’s desired accuracy To date, this series […]
Basic procedures and tools for ensuring GNNS-derived orthometric heights meet the project’s desired accuracy
In the latest installment of our ongoing series, the focus switches from GNSS-derived ellipsoid heights to procedures and tools for ensuring GNNS-derived orthometric heights meet the project’s desired accuracy.
Part 1 of this series appeared in the June Survey Scene newsletter, Part 2 appeared in the August newsletter, and Part […]
Part 3 describes the differences between a scientific gravimetric geoid model and a hybrid geoid model, and why it is important to use both geoid models in your analysis.
![Figure 2. NAD 83 (2011) Network Design for Stations EA0873 and EA0875. [Note: GNSS Vectors for GNSS projects GPS 1588 and GPS 2057 were provided by NGS].](https://www.gpsworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/DBZ_Newsletter_FIGURE2-201x250.jpg)
GNSS-derived ellipsoid heights are the basis for GNSS-derived orthometric heights, so it makes sense to make these ellipsoid heights as close to error free as possible. This article will discuss guidelines for detecting, reducing andr eliminating error sources in ellipsoid heights. It will focus on guidelines for establishing accurate ellipsoid heights in a local geodetic network. (Part 2 of a series)
Editor’s Note: This month, we introduce a column by David B. Zilkoski, one of our two new Survey […]
Follow Us